|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Xue Slick
The Damned Legion
3
   |
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi CCP,
Interesting changes...
I like the changes to Dread, glad to see them get a boost. Titans, meh, still no incentive for me to sub titan pilot again. What about a HP buff to the Dreads? The reason people don't use them is because of the Titan DDs, not the siege timers.
Maybe rather than remove all drones from Super Carriers, leave everything as is, just double the drone bandwidth of fighter bombers. This way you can only launch 10 which effectively halves the dps and saves your servers from the load monster. As said above, super carriers are often used by smaller alliance for small fights, now they going to be practically useless.
This is not really a change more then a massive nerf...
My 5c. |
Xue Slick
The Damned Legion
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Simple solution... want less super capitals on the field... make them 4 times as expensive so there is less of them?
CCP, you have made it so easy to make ISK that any Joe can get one now.
Easy changes:
- Double the bandwidth required for fighter and fighter bombers. Half the DPS and helps with system lag.
- Reduce Super Carrier and Titans EHP by 20%
- Increase Dreads and Carriers EHP by 20% ( Will solve your DD problem )
- Reduce the Siege cycle to 5 minutes
- Remove the Drone bays as stated and buff damage to Dreads
- Rework the cost of Super Capitals so less people can get into them. 2x, maybe 3x the price?
Do it CCP. |
Xue Slick
The Damned Legion
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 09:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xue Slick wrote:Simple solution... want less super capitals on the field... make them 4 times as expensive so there is less of them?
CCP, you have made it so easy to make ISK that any Joe can get one now.
Easy changes:
- Double the bandwidth required for fighter bombers. Half the DPS and helps with system lag.
- Reduce Super Carrier and Titans EHP by 20%
- Increase Dreads and Carriers EHP by 20% ( Will solve your DD problem )
- Reduce the Siege cycle to 5 minutes
- Remove the Drone bays as stated and buff damage to Dreads
- Rework the cost of Super Capitals so less people can get into them. 2x, maybe 3x the price?
Do it CCP.
I still stand by it, the above is what CCP should do. Give Logistics some immunity to the DD if they are such a problem. |
Xue Slick
The Damned Legion
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 11:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Just Another Toon wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
The poor performance of Minmatar capital ships is being looked at and was already being looked at before the blog was posted.
Pointing out flaws and issues with the balancing plan is very much appreciated. I will look into the issues and make changes where they are needed.
Once this hits SISI, I will start a thread in the test server feedback forums. Your concerns will be listened to and acted upon if necessary. You are stupid, best changes CCP have done and now your back tracking cos of a little forum pressure.. Carriers are logistics ships not offensive ships. Want to defend a carrier bring your sub cap fleet! Now im angry
And clearly a little touched... Carriers are perfect where they are. Cost to ability is about the best in the game. |
Xue Slick
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 10:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
Death2all Supercaps wrote:Anile8er wrote:I have a question for the the community, CCP, the Goon/TEST leadership, and Goon/TEST CSM's. I'm looking for a serious answer here in spite of the implied troll in my last line. So here goes:
Why should 20 billion isk worth of Hurricanes be the most versatile forces capable of dealing with support, BS fleets, capital fleets, supercapital fleets and sov warfare AND 20 billion isk worth of supercarrier be useful at killing only capitals and sov structures and only so when in larger numbers far surpassing 20 billion isk worth of ships on field AND they must be accompanied by yet another group of ships solely tasked with supporting them? because 20 billion isk in hurricans is over 250 people 250 people x 15 dollars a month = CCP making it rain. 20 billion isk in a supercarrier is 1 person 1 person RMTing isk with his bots that go unpunished = 0 $ for CCP What would you do if you were ccp? Edit: still waiting for CCP Tallest to comment more. been 60 pages bro
I approve... |
Xue Slick
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.15 22:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
tldr the last 20 pages. Any updates from CCPs side on this blog? |
Xue Slick
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.16 13:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Midnight Firestarter wrote:Goons want a Super nerf because they don't have that many = Devs want Super Nerf.
What? |
Xue Slick
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 09:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Simple solution to all these problems.
- Reduce the alliance sizes to say a 1000 chars max
- Remove the blue system. Make it so you only have the negetive range. From neutral to red.
- To support the lack of blueing, make a treaty system that costs both sides x amount per week. Very much like the current war decc system.
- Another option is to limit the amount of specific classes of ships in a fleet. X amount of Titans, X amount of Super carriers.
If you do want to to change the ships. Double the drone bandwidth requirements on the fighter bombers. This will allow you to still launch 20 regular drones. But limit you to only 10 Fighter bombers. Half the DPS and half the lag. Not sure why CCP wants to change fighters and why they want to **** the super carriers so badly that they become POS hiding bling again.
At the end of the day. The ships are not really the problem. They are fine on their own, as a blob they are a serious issue :S |
Xue Slick
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 10:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
whaynethepain wrote:How interesting, CCP works to the best of their ability to produce very powerful, useful ships and people complain.
This means improvement, can only be in the form of a nerf.
Perhaps if people complain enough, we will all be flying round in barges and haulers?
I vote to end player interference in game play!
Yes, I am bothered.
If you can't take the heat, fuk off.
I am sure that barges and haulers are the only ships you fly anyways v0v
Stick to your clothing and boots and let us help with the spaceships. |
|
|
| |
|